How does the response differ for a witnessed collapse versus an unwitnessed collapse in a child?

In the scenario of a witnessed collapse in a child, the immediate action is crucial because the situation allows for an assessment of the child's condition right before the event. In such cases, it is essential to quickly summon emergency assistance while the rescuer remains with the victim to provide immediate care. This approach ensures that the child receives support without unnecessary delay.

In contrast, the response to an unwitnessed collapse follows a different protocol. When the collapse is not witnessed, it may not be immediately clear how long the child has been unresponsive or if they are in need of immediate life-saving interventions. In these situations, activating emergency medical services before starting CPR is critical. This allows for professional help to be on the way while the rescuer begins the appropriate life support measures, given that unwitnessed arrests can significantly increase the time before intervention is received.

This differentiation in actions reflects the understanding that the immediate response can vary depending on whether the collapse was observed, influencing the timing and nature of the CPR efforts initiated.